Is it true that some states require Multiple Prime contracts?

Some states do indeed require Multiple Prime contracts, which is a practice where the project owner contracts directly with multiple prime contractors rather than with a single general contractor. This can occur in specific scenarios, such as when the project scope is broad and diverse, necessitating different specialties for various construction aspects, or when the owner wishes to have more control over the contract terms and relationships with the contractors.

The requirement for Multiple Prime contracts can stem from state laws or regulations that govern public construction projects to promote transparency and competitiveness. Additionally, this method can be favored in public projects to facilitate direct accountability, allowing for more direct oversight and involvement from the owner, thereby potentially improving project outcomes.

The complexity of certain projects and the potential for various phases or components to require unique expertise often lead to this approach being utilized. While it's not universal across all states, the existence of such regulation in some states supports the answer being true.