Should contract documents include modifications made after the bid?

The choice that emphasizes only including the original agreement in contract documents suggests a misunderstanding of contract management principles. In construction projects, it is essential for contract documents to accurately reflect the current agreement, including any modifications that have been made after the bid.

Inclusion of modifications is crucial for several reasons. First, it ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of their obligations and expectations, reducing the potential for disputes later on. Updates may arise due to change orders, project modifications, or negotiated settlements that alter the scope, schedule, or compensation. Failing to document these changes can lead to confusion and potential legal issues, as the original bid may no longer reflect the true state of the agreement.

Furthermore, particularly in the context of contracts, both formal and informal modifications—whether written or verbal—need to be documented to uphold enforceability. This practice safeguards all parties involved by providing a transparent record of decisions and changes made throughout the project lifecycle.

Overall, the integrity of the contract is upheld when it includes all modifications, ensuring that it serves as a reliable reference point throughout the duration of the project.