Which is a disadvantage of the Multiple Prime construction method?

The Multiple Prime construction method involves the owner contracting directly with multiple specialty contractors for different parts of a construction project, rather than through a single general contractor. This approach allows for a high degree of owner control and flexibility. However, it also introduces significant coordination challenges and time management risks, as the owner must oversee and organize the various contractors.

While having direct control over contractors might seem beneficial, it makes the owner responsible for managing schedules, subcontractor interactions, and ensuring that different trades work harmoniously together. This added complexity can lead to potential delays and conflicts, which may counteract the initial advantage of direct control. Distributing the responsibilities across multiple parties can complicate communication and hinder progress if not managed meticulously, leading to a higher likelihood of project overruns or issues.

In contrast, streamlined communication (the first option) is generally an advantage of this method, as it allows for direct lines of communication with specialized contractors. The guarantee of costs from the start (the third option) is not typically associated with the Multiple Prime method, as it can lead to variable costs rather than fixed pricing. Lastly, while higher quality guarantees (the fourth option) may arise from specialized contractors bringing specific expertise to their tasks, managing multiple contractors can complicate quality control rather than